It’s already election eve in Victoria and cyber-safety has had a prominent role in the campaign.


In September Victorian Premier John Brumby launched a new cyber-safety initiative for schools in Victoria.

At Fitzroy High School, with his Education and Respect Ministers Brownyn Pike and Justin Madden, and the Alannah and Madeline foundation CEO Judith Slocombe, he announced a full state-government funded roll-out of the Alannah and Madeline’s eSmart schools framework in Victorian schools.

eSmart is a program developed by the Alannah and Madeline foundation which involves schools implementing policies and strategies to attain eSmart status.

$10.6 Million will be provided by the state government over the next 3 years with $2000 for every Victorian government school and 300 needy non-government schools to help implement the initiative.

But what exactly is involved in eSmart?

Well it isn’t a single education program or advice sheet – rather a framework, system, guide, road map or set of tools supported by instructions and links to more external resources to improve cyber-safety in schools.

It’s unique and theoretical nature makes it somewhat difficult to communicate simply – but I will try to as observationally as possible so you form a picture in your head.

It promotes a behaviour a social change approach similar to the SunSmart and Quit initiatives.
It is based on the positive use of ICT, involving the whole community, and is versatile so can be adapted by schools to suit their specific situation, and entered a multiple points.

For schools it is based around a website portal with cyber-safety strategies and resources, the ability to track and record progress, submit activity, collaborate with other participants and promote your activities, professional development, a dedicated help desk, tip sheets, newsletters, access to further supporting material, and regular audits to keep it up to date.

When you login to the website, it comes up with a summary of your progression through stages of the domains of the framework.

On the left it has latest bulletin board posts, general information on what an eSmart school is, the domains, cyber-safety as an issue, eSmart teaching and learning, latest research, and spotlights on schools running the program.

On the right it has the eSmart self-assessment tool, your activity log, submissions, details, case study submissions, a quick tour powerpoint, a toolkit, newsletters and FAQ’s.

At the bottom it has six ‘Quick Tip’ links – ‘Leaving a Trail’, ‘My Brand’, ‘Chatterbox’, ‘Flicks and Pics’, ‘Bodyguard’, and ‘Google It’.

The main component is the interactive self-assessment tool, where you access each domain, their ‘Key Attributes’, you can select stages of ‘Planning’, ‘Implementing’ and ‘Evaluating, control your completion status of them, and in ‘assess your current situation’ view the details and requirements of each stage.

The eSmart toolkit contains a powerpoint breifing with various informatiom about cyber-safety in schools and a printable word school audit form with boxes to check on task completion, a technology in the classroom form with ideas and space to write what you’re doing, and a document with quick links to the stages of the key attributes of the domains.

The framework has six domains, informed by a set of characteristics and values.

Each domain has multiple ‘Key Attributes’, broken up into stages of ‘Planning’, ‘Implementing’ and ‘Evaluating’.

Each stage is supported and detailed with ‘Key Questions’, ‘Actions and strategies’, ‘Evidence required’ and ‘Resources’.

The domains and some of their key attributes are:
  1. Effective school organisation – including a school committee with various parties including kids to manage and drive the program
  2. School plans, policies and procedures – with computer supervision, links to government policies and reporting protocols
  3. Respectful and caring school community – with links to resources
  4. Effective teacher practices – with links to resources
  5. An eSmart curriculum – ensuring cyber-safety is embedded in the curriculum, with links to resources and the involvement of kids in the process
  6. Partnerships with parents and the local community – with parents invited, involved with the program and resources provided to them
Here is an example of of the key attributes of a domain:

Domain 3 – A respectful and caring school community
  1. A strong set of values guide behaviour
  2. Staff modelling of respectful behaviours
  3. Wide range of opportunities for cross-age interaction for all students in formal and informal ways

Here is an example of a stage of a key attribute of a domain:

Domain 5 – An eSmart curriculum
Key Attribute 2 – Teaching about cyber-risks and cyber-safe practices is evident in the curriculum
Stage 2 – Implementing
-
Key Questions
Has our school got a plan in place to ensure that teaching has been delivered to all students about cyber-risks and smart, safe and responsible practices?
Has professional learning been delivered to ensure the currency of teachers’ knowledge on cyber-risks and smart, safe and responsible practices?
Are there working protocols in place about ‘netiquette’ which teachers and students agree to and follow?
Actions and strategies
Develop and implement a plan to include up-to-date knowledge of cyber-risks and smart, safe and responsible practices in the curriculum.
Develop and implement a plan to support teacher knowledge and skills about cyber-risks and smart, safe and responsible practices.
Develop a survey to test whether protocols about ‘netiquette’ are working effectively.
Survey staff and student about ‘netiquette’.
Evidence required
Professional learning plan
Survey tool
Resources

www.cybersmart.gov.au/Schools.aspx
Student Education and skill levels
Schools>Cybersafety policies and procedures>Student technology audit
Protecting computers: e-security
Information about keeping your computer safe when using the internet and school responses to e-security issues
Schools>Common cybersafety issues> Protecting computers: e-security> Common e-security threats
Schools>Common cybersafety issues> Protecting computers: e-security> school responses to e-security issues
Schools>Common cybersafety issues>Protecting computers: e-security >Resources and links
Continued.
Getting help
www.cybersmart.gov.au/report.aspx
www.thinkuknow.org.au
www.kidshelp.com.au
www.bullyingnoway.com.au
http://au.reachout.com
www.beyondblue.org.au
www.bravehearts.org.au
-
Evidently the initiative draws heavily upon the resources of ACMA’s Cybersmart schools portal, and those of other organisations.

Specifically the government has ensured:
  • A 4-student action team at every government school
  • Training for one staff member from each government school to become a eSmart coordinator
  • eSmart progress certificates for schools in the process of reaching full status
  • The requirement of re-application every 3 years to ensure full compliance and relevance
This comes on the back of a substantial pilot trial of the program at 159 schools, across demographics, denominations, sectors and locations, supported and funded by State and Federal governments, the Telstra Foundation and NAB, amongst others.

An independent evaluation of the program was conducted by the Edith Cowan University in WA and provided to the DEEWR, anecdotally reported to be successful, but is yet to be publicly released.

Although it can be very effective it very much depends on the effort schools put in.

Given the substantial financial government support for the program I think it would be important that complete compliance checks are undertaken, making sure school’s are understanding and implementing the program and spending the money effectively.

As long as is disseminated practical advice about the issues facing kids online like privacy, addiction, bullying, security, illegality, inappropriate content and contact, and avenues for answers when problems arise, this will be a very effective program.
This is a big step in the realization of cyber-safety education in the curriculum of every school in the nation, and an example of good practice for other governmental and organisational jurisdictions in Australia and around the world. More eSmart frameworks are currently being developed for workplaces, libraries and community centres. I would suggest it would be sensible for the AMF to consider developing ones for higher education, and families as well.

The Coaltion has provided full support for the government’s initiative, vowing to continue it in its entirety if they form government – and has gone one-step further – promising an extra $4 Million for general cyber-safety educative measures in Victoria.

When asked what the Coalition’s vision for cyber-safety in Victoria was, Victorian Shadow Education Minister Martin Dixon told The Wood Verdict , “We believe that education and information for students, families and teachers is the crucial first step in starting to combat all types of bullying in our community.”

The next largest parties fail to mention any relevant policy detail on their websites.

Recognition should go to the positive ‘Don’t Hurt‘ media campaign by Leader community newspapers in Melbourne to raise awareness, inform and advocate better cyber-safety measures. What influence this had on policy is hard to measure – but it can only have helped and possibly made a big difference – a great example of the power of positive use of media mediums.

Mention should also go to the good partially-state-government funded ‘Digital Demons‘ school program supported by Kaspersky and the Melbourne Football Club, currently being piloted in 23 schools across the City of Casey.

The fact that the major political parties are not just giving significant attention to these issues in this election but actively competing for better policies is great for Aussie kids.

If only they can just go one step further and mandate it across all school sectors – the job would almost be done.

Limewire is dead.

The massive monopoly for downloading music for so long is gone – what was used by so many over so many years shut down so quickly.
In The Wood Verdict, US Federal judge Kimba M. Wood forced Limewire to disable “searching, downloading, uploading, file trading and/or file distribution functionality” of its software, as it “intentionally encouraged infringement”, was used “overwhelmingly for infringement” and it knew about the “substantial infringement being committed” by its users.
Anti-piracy advocates and organisations in the US and Australia have lauded it a victory for anti-piracy, Sabiene Heindl, the General Manager of Music Industry Piracy Investigations saying, “we’re very optimistic that this court result today will mean that there will be a reduction in illegal file sharers” to the ABC’s PM program.
But technology expert Mark Pesce was spot on on that program too to say that “you really have a cat and mouse game here, where neither side is really going to gain any sort of permanent long-term advantage over the other, but that gap is large enough for a lot of file sharing to take place.”
More than anyone today is a victory for Frostwire, Limewire’s fully free, open source sister.
-
The case will be back in the courts in January where after ruling in May that Limewire and its operator are liable for damages just how much they will have to pay will be decided – which will really depend on how tough Judge Wood wants to be, as the real cost would be many, many billions.
But as Marc Pesce says this result is just another move in this cat-and-mouse game and long-term advantage by either side will fail to result.
What I believe is needed is Guvera.
The file-sharing networks run by peers are practically unstoppable, enforcement options are erratic and impracticable.
Peter Coroneos, the CEO of the Internet Industry Association is right to say, “A better question to ask is how do you package paid services in a way that the convenience that they provide, perhaps that the security that they provide is such that it becomes a compelling proposition for people that they wouldn’t feel any motivation to use unlawful means of accessing content.”
Guvera is a free, advertising-supported music downloading service, that is legal – with enough content and convenience that it just may penetrate the establishment, avoid the tit-for-tat cat-and-mouse and take the higher moral and tangible ground.
Some people will always buy music because they think it’s right.
Some will buy or contribute financially to those they really like.
Most, will not – and they will continue, to get it for free.
There will be no winners.
But if the music industry can invest the time and energy on perfecting and implementing models like Guvera where they can reach a point of equilibrium, making as much profit as they can while providing users a service they will use, this pointless game may just come to an end.
The era of location networking has just begun, largely thanks to the advent of Facebook Places, and GPS-capable devices like the iPhone.
This is a great logical next step for social networking that will really add it value – to share places out of interest, and crossovers into the real world to meet up with friends who might be close.
But this new era opens a can of worms in terms of privacy risks.
Obviously where you are is something you don’t want everyone to know, so it’s important you take extra precautions to make sure your privacy is kept safe.
Something many haven’t done, personally observed by Facebook friends checking in at home.
But they’re friends, so it doesn’t really matter.
Wrong.
I tried to check in on my iPhone, and in ‘Nearby Places’ searched for ‘home’.
What came up was a plethora of homes near me people had checked into, and if you clicked on them you could see their exact location!
Luckily by default Facebook doesn’t let people who aren’t your friends see where you have checked in on your profile or in places. But many people are friends with people they don’t know that well, who wouldn’t want following their every move.
-
All across Australia and around the world, people are letting their privacy guard down evidenced by just how many people are checking in at home.
This should be a wake up call to all the users, those with influence and the providers of these services to minimize the privacy risks it can present.
And if you can’t not check in at home, at least don’t add friends you don’t know.
3 Years ago Labor gained office with a progressive cyber-safety agenda.
Has Labor honored their commitments? What has changed in that time? Importantly, what difference has been made for kids? And what are the political parties offering as we move forward?
In this post I will be assessing the policies, and performance of political parties going into this Federal Election, and expressing what more needs to be done.
-
In November 2007 Labor released a ‘Plan for Cyber-Safety’ – outlining their policies going into the term that’s coming to an end.
It involved:
  • Requiring ISP’s to offer a filtered internet service, using an expanded ACMA blacklist
  • Supporting and providing educative resources
  • Overhauling and making the government’s cyber-safety website relevant and effective (now http://www.cybersmart.gov.au/),
  • Making a dedicated site for kids
  • Providing an online helpline (chatline) where kids can access experts to help with problems confidentially and in real time
  • Ensuring student teachers are trained in cyber-safety from 2009
  • Ensuring existing teachers are trained in these areas
  • Expanding the terms of reference for the Consultative Working Group from online predators to cyber-safety in general
  • Establishing a ‘Youth Advisory Group’ on Cyber-Safety, to report to the Working Group
  • Support research into cyber-safety
  • Establishing a Joint Parliamentary Standing Committee on Cyber-Safety
  • Funding for the Federal Police, DPP, ACMA and the DBCDE
Since then, there have been some changes and additions to the policy:
  • The filter policy has been specified to not just require the offering of filtering by ISP’s, but making filtering of RC content on the ACMA blacklist mandatory
  • The Youth Advisory Group involves hundreds of kids from many schools, rather than a small specialized committee
  • A Sub-Committee on Cyber-Bullying has been established as part of the Consultative Working Group
  • $17 Million more funding has been added to ACMA’s Outreach program
  • There has been an announcement of a ‘Teachers and Parents Advisory Group’ to operate similarly to the Youth Advisory Group
In terms of implementation of these policies;
  • After lengthy trials, the filter policy still lies in limbo after a lengthy review of filtered content takes place, possibly involving expanding the ACMA blacklist
  • The NetAlert website was overhauled into a better, more effective, age and party-relevant website called CyberSmart, launched in July 2009. In terms of content however, it could still be organized more efficiently, completely and with more effectiveness. Some good smaller initiatives have been launched such as the innovative Cybersmart Heroes program earlier this year, video’s and brochures
  • Personalized assistance for kids has been taken over by the Kids Helpline, both on the phone and confidentially as chat on the internet. However I’m not sure it has been promoted enough and if Kids Helpline staff have been supported with enough training
  • The ACMA education initiative Outreach program with experts speaking at schools has been continued and been provided more funding
  • Training programs for existing and trainee teachers have been developed, their reach and whether they’re mandatory I am not sure
  • The Consultative Working Group has been expanded
  • A Cyber-Bullying Sub-Committee have been made
  • The Youth Advisory Committee was made, now involving 30 schools, substantial online and physical interaction. Their input has been taken in developing a downloadable help button
  • A Joint Parliamentary Standing Committee has not been made, rather a Select Committee, that has been running this year, the difference of I’m not sure
  • Research was commissioned and funding provided to the leading Professor Donna Cross at Edith Cowan University in Perth, and another project by the Illawarra Regional Information Service and Australian Council for Educational Research. I believe there should have been more time and funding given and support for original local research. And the responses to research recommendations has been less than adequate.
  • $3 Million to an Alannah and Madeline Foundation Pilot Program for Schools which is good
  • A new ISP Code of Practice was recently established
  • The AFP and DPP have received funding for their continued important roles
In this election, the coalition if offering:
  • Scrapping the ISP-Filter
  • Providing $60 Million for PC-based filtering
  • Providing $30 Million more to ACMA’s Outreach program
  • Empowering Principals and provide $10.5 Million for a new national anti-cyber-bullying campaign
  • Establishing a Ministerial Advisory Committee on Social Networking
I expect the coalition to support most of the good general educative and collaborative programs that have run in this term. However I think the $60 Million for PC-based filtering is excessive and unnecessary, given their limited value, previously low take up rates, availability of free ones such as K9, and money that could spent on education. The proposed expansion of the Outreach program is good, as well as funding for a new campaign, however I think it should be more general than just cyber-bullying. I’m not sure exactly how Ministerial Advisory Committee’s work, but it’s probably good, but should be more general too – not just social networking.
-
I would expect the smaller parties to support the the general education services too with Family First for filtering and The Greens and Sex Party strictly against it.
-
I believe the performance of the current government in regards to cyber-safety has been moderately good. I probably expected too much and now realize without the involvement of state governments, making cyber-safety education compulsory in classroom curriculum’s is practically impossible.
-
Australian kids still face considerable issues online, including; addiction, privacy, harassment, security, inappropriate content, contact and illegality.
What more I would like to see the Federal Government do about it is:
  • Seek out, provide more funding and allow more time for original, local research
  • Be more responsive to research recommendations
  • Have better coordination between government departments to remove large inefficiencies
  • Continue engaging young people and ensure responsiveness to their ideas
  • Ensure there is adequate training for all people working with young people, including principals, health professionals (counselors, chaplains, psychologists), librarians and authorities
  • More awareness and training for parents
  • Support for community and private programs such as the video ‘Photograph’, movie ‘Best Enemies’, Project Rockit, I could go on…
  • Promote and provide more training to helpline operators
  • Collaborate with State Government’s, to help provide resources, and apply pressure for education to be compulsory in curriculum’s
  • Keep things up-to-date as the landscape changes
In terms of filtering, for the limited value ISP filtering would have, complications and opposition, I don’t think it’s worth it. Ensuring parents have access to PC-based filters, for younger kids, as long as not too much is spent, is sensible.
But what’s imperative now is that education gets in and is made compulsory in classroom curriculum’s, and for that it’s time for State Government’s to take action.
-
Otherwise, sorry I haven’t posted for so long. I’ve finished school and am taking time off to decide what direction I and this site will go in. Hopefully, that will be the end of the year.
Regards
Tom

I’ve just realized way too much of cyber-safety’s attention has been on minimizing negativity – whilst not enough has been given to harnessing positivity.

Courtney Martin, a columnist for The American Prospect Online, has just posted an article about how it’s humans, not technology, that cause most cyber-problems – and as humans, can do a lot of cyber-good as well – link – “But, as with all technology, we must recognize that it is not the tool that produces the mistreatment, it’s the wounded humans using that tool. And just as so many have managed to manipulate the Internet, many can also be inspired to use it for good.” She argues we should put effort into promoting ‘cyber-compassion’.

Courtney cites some examples of this so called ‘cyber-compassion,’ and pleads, “We must resist the inclination to brand all of the Internet as dangerous, evil, or dissident, and instead recognize it for what it is – one more communication revolution in need of intentional and inspired leadership. ”

Senator-until-a-few-weeks ago Natasha Stott Despoja’s recent youth poll found 22% of teens have experienced cyber-bullying (or as I’ll be calling it now, Internet Bullying). On the surface that sounds pretty bad. But subtract that from the total and you’ll soon realize that 78% of teens have not experienced cyber-bullying. Their time online has been fine – and that can only be a good thing. I’ve said for a long time it is important that technology isn’t demonized in efforts of goodwill – rather accepted as an overwhelming force for good – with a few bad elements.

Whatever you want to call it, Courtney’s point is clear, and very pertinent – that instead of dwelling on negativity – recognizing, and harnessing the positivity of the cyber-world is just as, if not more important.

It’s easy to dismiss this as a typical shot for positivity when it’s not really that helpful to the cause – but if you actually look into some of the examples she highlights – you’ll see her message is quite practical as well.

A message that should resonate with us all.

Back in January it was Corey Corey Corey.

Now it’s iPhone iPhone iPhone.

On the tip of every tech-teen’s tongue.

And it will take Cyberia into its next era.

The era of: The Smartphone.

Voice, then text communication have been the core functions of mobiles since they rose to prominence in the late 90′s.

But only in the last few years has other, more exciting functions been widely incorporated, such as cameras, video reordering and calling, Bluetooth transfer, picture transfer (MMS), and theinternet.

Mobiles have already had their fair share of cyber-issues – text bullying – text addiction – fake sender id’s, scams, the spreading of party details, the production and access of inappropriate content, and theft to name a few.

But their focus, in general, thus far, has still been on talking and texting.
And that’s all about to change.

Smartphones have been around for years. But they haven’t really taken to kids yet – rather their prominence is in the business community.

And because the focus of mobiles so far hasn’t been their extra features – such as internet – the negative effects of such things on mobiles hasn’t been that big, pretty minimal.

But the focus of Smartphones is just the opposite – the internet, camera’s and all the like – to make them as useful as possible.

The Nielsen Online Australian Internet + Technology report 2007 looked at the difference between features of mobiles, and the use of them. The biggest difference was to do with mobileinternet. The report found that although about 66% of mobiles had internet functionality – only about 27% of people who had it, used it – so less than half who have it use it.

I think the 2 main reasons why the mobile internet hasn’t been embraced by kids are; 1) It is very expensive to use and a lot of the time kids are worried because they’re not sure what the cost will be and 2) The sheer effort of visiting, navigating and using the web on tiny little screens is so inconvenient kids just can’t be bothered to.

And that wasn’t making businesses money. So Apple came up with a cunning plan – to address these issues – creating a mobile with internet that people will love to use. So they firstly put in wireless internet – so when you have access to that, which in many places there is – the internetwill be completely free – and make it much easier to use, to navigate, to type in addresses, have multiple pages sites, click on links, zoom in and out and all the like. Essentially, to make mobileinternet use as convenient as pyshically possible.

And make it cheap. Very cheap.

Through Apple’s own research, they found the main reason people didn’t buy the original iPhone was that it cost just too much. I was expecting it to be near $1000 when it came out in Australia. So they cut it right down into a really competitive contention, around $250 for the smaller model – and with some phone plans – free at first.

Sounds very profitable – that’s why we’re soon going to see a flood of other, similar devices coming onto the Aussie market soon – such as the HTC Diamond, Nokia N96, Blackberry Bold, Samsung Omnia and the LG Secret.

Don’t have any doubt though – none of them will conquer the iPhone. Apple just has that invinsible X-factor.

So say goodbye to mobiles. Welcome to the rise of the smartphone – the iPhone perhaps being the catalyst of this rise.

So how does this associate with the main cyber-safety issues of: Bullying, Addiction, Privacy, Security and Inappropriate Content?

Firstly, the simple increase of time kids spend on the net – on social networking sites and MSN, that smartphones will result in, will obviously increase the internet-bullying that goes on.

And if there is wireless internet in a school – expect kids to be looking down under their desks all day – as instead of doing maths, they’ll be on MySpace. And they won’t have to worry about the cost – wireless internet is free of course.

It’ll increase the amount of coordinated technological harassment taking place – groups of kids will sit around planning their cyber-attacks on social networking sites and MSN – more cyber-gangs, if you like.

Kids will film, and take photos of other kids secretly, or knowingly but without consent – manipulating them and doing whatever they want, embarrassing and humiliating them via visual means.

So it will increase and intensify internet-bullying quite a bit.

Then comes addiction.

Now it’s easy for parents to take a physically grounded PC out of a kids room and put it in an open family area to help prevent internet addiction. It’s a little harder for kids to smuggle laptops into their rooms and be on the internet wirelessly under their covers throughout the night – but it is happening.

And mobiles aren’t as much of an issue – text addiction is just not as common.

But the pure portability of smartphones, not much bigger than credit cards – detached from all but kids hips pockets, will change this all. If you have wireless internet at home – or your neighbours have open networks, which many do – then kids will be able to go on the internet as much as they want throughout the night – possibly without their parents having a clue. Chatting on MSN – Social Networking in the dark hours – what could be better?

Addiction, and the time kids spend online, will get out of control. And it’ll be extremely hard to stop.

Privacy shouldn’t be inflicted upon that much.

Security will a bit – more bluetooth connections to hack, and a lot of valuable material to steal.

And it will be an inappropriate content nightmare.

Girls, and fewer boys, already take pictures of their nude bodies and send them to certain people on mobiles – and often, for many different reasons, they are forwarded on and spread around and around until everyone’s seen them. They feel destroyed. Just this week statistics were released revealing that 32 Victorian teens were charged with the production of child pornography over this sort of thing in 2007! - link – Obviously that is just the tip of the ice berg, but none-the-less, this will be happening much, much more.

And such a portable, and personal device will open up access to porn like never before – again with wireless internet behind closed bedroom doors at night – and with their hefty hard drives a whole load will be able to be saved to watch whenever they desire.

So what can be done?

As always, educate – but no matter what the impact won’t be able to be controlled as effectively as in the past. That’s because of the portability.

Parents will have to understand that giving kids these portable, multifunctional devices is giving them the ability to look up any material whenever they want, as long as they have wirelessinternet. So essentially parents would be saying I have my full trust in you, have this. And many kids are trustworthy – so as long as they are, and don’t show risk factors, then that may well beok.

But at home wireless networks, if parents are concerned about addiction, should be turned off at night time. But sometimes that won’t work because neighbours will have them… which really leaves no option – other than to ban the devices at night.

Schools as they always do can filter the internet at the source (installing a filter on the devise itself will be most likely disabled my a kid in minutes) – but I expect a range of proxy applications to soon be made that will help void any filters at the source anyway.

To stop inside-class wagging schools could consider disabling access to wireless networks in certain classes, time’s etc.

Clear cyber-safety policies backed up with effective education programs teaching clearly how to prevent/deal with any bullying should be implemented to ensure that is kept at a minimum.

This should also make kids vividly aware of the possible ramifications of sending inappropriate pics of oneself to others – and to stop porn being saved, spread … well just like controlling neighbour network addiction … will require someone much smarter than me to figure out how to fix.

All strategies of dealing with the Internet based problems that could be dealt due to the physically grounded nature of computers in a house will now become redundant.

The PC will really be in the pocket.

Apple, a company thats image is nothing less than cutting edge, is in a perfect position to consider and help address these issues through funding research and education programs themselves – but this will really show, whether behind their slick face, Apple is just in it for the money.

So unless, again I say, we get the education and strategies to all the parties involved – the rise of the smartphones will conquer us all too soon.

Someone call Max Markson.

Last month I said, “the words ‘Cyber-Bullying’ have a humorous quality often exploited by teenagers, so use the words ‘Online Harassment’ instead.”

And I just knew it was true – a lot of teenagers, especially older boys, tend to disregard online abuse when the term cyber-bullying is used. Bullying isn’t funny. Cyber isn’t funny. But when cyber is used in conjunction with something else, like bullying, for some, unexplainable reason, it is. It’s not because kids think bullying people over the internet is funny – it’s just something to do with the word. Maybe not ‘funny’ for some – but silly. It’s not perceived like this because kids are bad – it’s just a general thing to do with youth humor.

And this theory I think is proved today with some new research that has just come out of America – link. In a survey conducted by SAFE (Substance Abuse Free Environment) of 3,350 school students across multiple levels, 26.2 percent answered yes when asked if they had “received a threatening e-mail, text message or instant message”. But when asked directly if they had “been a victim of cyber-bullying” only 10.9 responded yes.

Receiving threatening messages is, in essence, cyber-bullying, but less than half of those who had received threatening messages saw it that way. Why this strange and substantial difference?

It’s because, put simply, Cyber-Bullying has a serious image problem amongst youth.

Also, because a lot of teenagers aren’t sensitive, they tend to fob it off as, well, a non-problem. Usually the top of the social crop. And subsequently the collective school attitude follows.

But not all kids have a psyche of steel.

Using the term ‘online harassment’, or something else, instead of cyber-bullying, to contend the problem of cyber-bullying, would not help its reputation in terms of its severity as a problem, but it would remove any element of humor the word may project, which if anything, would help it be perceived seriously by kids. And it matters because if they don’t take the concept seriously, because of a word, there is a lesser chance advice on the subject will achieve any traction in their minds.

So educators and the community must account for this in cyber-safety responses.

Words can make or brake something when it comes to kids. Cyber-Bullying, although well intended, just doesn’t cut it.

Recently my friend Michael Carr-Gregg blogged – link – about the new movie coming out called ‘The Happening’ – link. Not because of its deplorable critical reception, but its possibly devastating psychological connotations. It is a film about suicide – ‘The Happening’ referring to a phenomenon where people shoot, stab and plunge their way off rooftops to violent deaths.

Many psychological studies have found media that contains suicide methods may promote a ‘werther effect’ – copycat suicides – especially in young people.

So the Australian Psychological Society is arguing that this film, instead of being designated an MA ratings, should get an R rating – to be seen in the cinemas by people psychologically more developed – perhaps decreasing the chance it could have negative ramifications.

And so it should. Any measures to decrease its exposure should be taken. I’ve said once and I’ll say it again – the best society is one where freedom is granted to an extent where people can’t harm other people or themselves. This may promote people harming themselves.

But there is a huge dilemma. A huge dilemma not with just this movie, but all movies, games, and music. This affects the entire classification system. And as always, it’s due to the digital age we live in.

Parents can no longer rest assure that these classifications will keep there kids eyes from this worrying material. Because the entire classification system is being fundamentally undermined. Because increasingly kids, especially older teens, are illegally downloading music, games and movies for free – voiding any classification system in the world. No laws apply.

So no matter what this film is rated – it may not really matter. Because kids will simply download it. Too easy. In fact, thousands of people are sharing it on sites like this right now – link.

Where classifications, guidelines and ratings for the media used to have almost complete control over what kids could watch – a lot of that control has been lost. The control now lies with the kids. And the parents, too. But ultimately it’s too hard to regulate with this ramphant cyber-world.

The reccomendation that this movie should recieve an R ratings is a good one – because it can only be good. It will raise awareness as well. But unfortunely it’s not foolproof. And there is really nothing much that can be done about it. Just another detriment of Cyberia…

Quote from – link

Cyber‑safety Plan

Expense ($m)
2007‑08 2008‑09 2009‑10 2010‑11 2011‑12
Australian Federal Police - 8.7 12.7 13.2 13.0
Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy - 7.3 32.5 6.6 4.9
Australian Communications and Media Authority - 5.5 3.0 2.8 2.8
Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions - 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.9
Total - 24.3 51.1 25.4 23.6
Australian Federal Police - 0.7 0.6 0.1 -

The Government will provide $125.8 million over four years to establish the Cyber‑safety Plan.

The Cyber‑safety Plan will provide a range of initiatives to combat online threats and protect children from inappropriate material on the internet, through activities such as an education program for teachers and the community, Internet Service Provider level filtering of an expanded Australian Communications and Media Authority blacklist, examination of options to allow families to exclude other unwanted content, a Youth Advisory Group to assist the Government to formulate age‑appropriate measures to protect children, an expanded Consultative Working Group focused on cyber‑safety issues, a dedicated website for children and research projects on cyber‑safety issues.

From 2009‑10, Internet Service Providers will receive a one‑off subsidy towards the costs of installing Internet Service Providers filters. This funding will largely occur in 2009‑10 with funding in following years only for new providers.

This measure will continue funding for the Australian Federal Police and the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions for the investigation and prosecution relating to incidents of child sexual exploitation.

See also the related savings measure titled Protecting Australian Families Online in the Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy portfolio.

This measure delivers on the Government’s election commitment.

Interestingly the ‘related savings’ contention is a bit misleading. The area of spending was simply renamed from ‘Protecting Australian Families Online’ to ‘Cyber-safety plan’ as shown here – link

Also, I’m sure the ISP filtering subsidy will attract much media interest – perhaps a positive incentive for specialized filtering ISP’s to be established? A backup plan to provide some ISP-filtering in case the mandatory ISP-filtering doesn’t work out?

Anyhow, in regards to Cyber-Safety, this budget will be judged on the response to promises made by the government, and its response to my recommendations.

They include – link

  • Funding for research – Yes.
  • Youth advisory group – Yes.
  • Expanded consultative working group – Yes.
  • An effective advice website setup – Yes.
  • Cyber-Safety education – Yes.

So far pretty good – the fundamentals are covered. But there are a few questions:

  • Online chatline – Not mentioned – Possibly a component of the website, however?
  • Joint Parliamentary Committee – Not mentioned?

Update: The Wood Verdict was contacted by the Minister’s Office today and these questions have been confirmed to have been covered – very good:)

The former government provided $189 Million in funding for cyber-safety – which is much more. But the over-arching component of that was the National Filter Scheme – which, in my view, was not merited, and that policy lacked the fundamentals of youth-involvement and a strong focus on education. So overall, although the money is not as much – it should be much more effective.

The allocation for cyber-safety in this budget sets an adequate capital basis upon which, I think, an effective federal Cyber-Safety plan can be implemented, with of course, I hope, more refinement and possibly minor additions.

So all the focus should now be on one word – Delfin.
No, not that amusingly annoying ad.

Instead – Implementation.


“thank you soo much you don’t know how much this has helped me” – Chelley, 16


Cyber-bullying is any harassment through technology.
It is unprovoked and unwarranted.
It affects at least 10% of Aussie kids*.
It can be 24/7, compounded by an audience watching, and can be viewed over and over again.
But this constructed world also offers unique possibility of evidence, and intervention.
The human motivations won’t change, but with action the damage, and behaviour can.

Kids

Keep in mind, it is not your fault, and sometimes people don’t really mean what they say, sometimes things get lost in translation. Don’t let the emotion of the moment guide your actions, step back, think for a while, maybe give it a day, and work through the steps below to resolve the situation so you can use the computer happily again. Finally, if you see someone else being bullied online, don’t be a silent bystander, but report the abuse yourself (but don’t intervene in the argument!), and it might really help someone who might not know they can do that.

Adults

Do not dare overreact or punish a child if they experience harassment online. 78% of kids are worried if they tell an adult; they will be disconnected from the computer, hence stopping them from sharing it. Kids also worry that it’ll complicate the situation, by having worried adults adding to the trauma and kids often think adults mightn’t be able to help. So firstly, don’t appear to be bothered (even if you are), and don’t disconnect a child. Let them know this. Let them know they haven’t done anything wrong, and you’ll talk to them about it, and work through the steps below to peacefully resolve the issue so they can use the computer happily again.

Schools

Make a cyber-safety policy, and endeavour to implement student involved education programs with a cyber-bullying component comprised of something like my guide below. If students are cyber-bullied by other students, in school time or not, you have a legal duty to intervene, do whatever necessary to support the victim, deal the perpetrator, remove the content and contact authorities if necessary. Also, the terminology ‘Cyber-Bullying’ can be perceived as corny and not taken seriously, so perhaps use online/internet bullying/harassment instead.

To Prevent – Tips

• Be extra sensitive about what you say online – what you intend may be perceived differently
• Don’t incite abuse, by arguing, flaming or annoying someone
• Consider it might not mean what you think – things can be perceived not as they were meant online
• Don’t Share Passwords with friends – they fight!
• Make hard-to-guess secret questions so people can’t get into your accounts
• Turn on comment moderation to stop offensive comments from being published
• Tell your friends if a joke goes too far
• Only get Formspring profiles etc. if you can take abuse
• Ask them to stop harassing you, and if they don’t…


To Resolve – 5 Steps

1. Don’t respond AT ALL (It will make it worse)
2. Save the evidence for future reference (Instruction Below)
3. Block and Delete the perpetrator from the website or service (Instruction Below)
4. Report Abuse to the Admins of the website or service, to remove the content and punish the perpetrator (Instruction Below)
5. Tell People you Trust – friends, adults, teachers, parents to support you, and help deal resolve it, and police if necessary – especially if it’s anonymous – as it can be a criminal offence


Saving the Evidence

Make a folder on your computer to save all the evidence in. To save text, highlight it (press Ctrl-A, or Apple-A on Macs to highlight it all), and copy it into a notepad or word document. To take a screenshot (a picture of your computer screen), search for the ‘snipping’ application. On Windows XP and older and press the print screen button (above the arrow keys, top right of the keyboard), then go into the start menu, programs, accessories, paint, press Ctrl-V (copy), and click file and save. On Macs you can press apple-shift-3 to save a screenshot to the desktop. To save an image on a webpage right click on it (or control-click on Macs) and select ‘save image’. To save a YouTube video or other online video, visit – http://vixy.net/ – post the ‘web address’ of the video into the ‘URL’ box, and then click start. It will convert the video into the .avi file type that can play on Windows & Macs, and then let you download it onto your computer.

Deleting, Blocking and Reporting Abuse to the Administrator


Facebook

Log in, visit a profile and select ‘unfriend’ at the bottom left to remove a person. You can select ‘Report/Block This Person’ there too and follow the steps if you want to block them too. To report abuse, click ‘Report/Block This Person’, and follow the steps. Sometimes there are report links accompanying posts.

YouTube

You need an account, to get one click ‘Create Account’ up the top right, and register. If you have a Google account you can sign in with that too. Login to your account, when watching any video click the flag icon, which will give you an option of selecting why you want to report it, probably ‘bullying’ under ‘Hateful and Abusive Content’, or otherwise if it’s something else, and click ‘Flag This Video’.

Formspring

To report people click ‘Help’ at the bottom, ‘Submit a Request’ at the top and fill in the details. To block a user
select ‘Block Their Name’ at the bottom right of their profile.
To make your Formspring private click ‘Settings’, ‘Privacy’, and select ‘Protect
My Account’. In the same section you can disallow anonymous questions from people who
aren’t logged in, or disallow anonymous questions completely.

MSN

Log in, right click on contact in your contact list and select ‘Delete contact’. When the dialogue box pops up, select ‘Also block this contact’ as well and click ok. Click the ‘Help’ menu (Alt-H if it doesn’t appear), and click ‘Report abuse’ – Type your name, email in – the bullies email – what type of abuse, and then paste the evidence in the box. You could also turn message history on to ensure the evidence is recorded. To do this, click ‘tools’, ‘options’, ‘messages’ and tick the box that says ‘automatically keep a history of my conversations’. If you want to, you can download Messenger Plus here – which has a function of recording your message history with password security.

Bebo

Login, click ‘Friends’, click the cross icon on the perpetrator to delete the perpetrator. Now visit the perpetrator’s profile, and click ‘Block’ and click ‘Report Abuse’, then click ‘Report Abuse Only’. Make your profile private by clicking on ‘Profile’, ‘Edit profile’, ‘Privacy Settings’, select ‘My friends only’ and ‘Update Privacy Settings’.

MySpace

Log in, select ‘Friends’, select who you want to delete, and click ‘Delete’. Visit their profile, click on the arrow next to the clog wheel icon, and select ‘Block User’. To report abuse visit the perpetrators profile, click on the arrow next to the clog wheel icon, and select ‘Report Abuse’. Put in your name, email, type of abuse, detail the relevant evidence, provide links and click ‘Report’. To make your profile private, hover over ‘My Stuff’ up the top, select ‘Privacy Settings’ and selection ‘My Friends only’ and save the changes.

Email

Right click on message or open the options menu and click ‘view source’ or ‘headers’, and copy and save that. Block the perpetrator’s address in settings if you can. Notify your ISP, notify the perpetrator’s ISP if you want.

Games

Runescape, click the report abuse button down the bottom right. For others, Google search the games name and report abuse. Eg. Runescape report abuse.

Mobiles

Only some phones can block numbers, go into the settings and select block caller – put the perpetrators number in. Contact your service provider, report it to them. Contact the perpetrator’s service provider (if known) and report it.

Random websites/forums

Click contact admin button, send them an email or message and most likely they will take action against the perpetrator. For services/website’s you’re not sure about visit abuse.net’s web lookup page to see if they have an email address, or try emailing it to abuse@thewebsite.com oradmin@thewebsite.com etc.

Finally, contact your local police if you need more help, or want to take it further.

New South Wales
Victoria
Queensland
South Australia
Western Australia
Tasmania
Northern Territory
Australian Capital Territory – 131444
Federal Police – 131444, (02) 6131 3000 in Victoria and Queensland

You can also call Kids Helpline on 1800 55 1800 or access web counselling if you want personalized support.


* http://www.couriermail.com.au/lifestyle/parenting/cyberbullying-hits-1-in-10-australian-teenagers/story-e6frer7o-1225852147677

This guide may be reproduced free of charge as long as I am notified and author details are included.